“Franklin: Mr. Adams
But, Mr. Adams
The things I write are only light extemporania
I won't put politics on paper, it's a mania!
So I refuse to use the pen in Pennsylvania”
From “But, Mr. Adams” by Sherman Edwards appearing in the Original Broadway Cast album 1776 (1969)
I will not write about politics here. Ever. And I’m sad about that. Now here’s why:
A long time ago back when the filibuster was used judiciously (NOT), when the House and Senate were the bastions of old white men with just one or two or three women and the first (and only for a long time) black man in the Senate was a Republican from Massachusetts, when candidates for national office were selected by the national parties in smoke-filled hotel rooms, I was a bright-eyed, half-smart but woefully ignorant, college freshman who chose political science as my major in college.
“It’s the Sixties, Man!”
– The Marvelous Mrs. Maisal, Season 3, Episode 2, written by Daniel Palladino and Amy Sherman-Palladino
Well, actually it was 1970. But since the time-space continuum is dragged down by the slow pace of thinking and apple butter making in Southwest Virginia, it was the sixties, which lasted there until at least 1972.
My political science professors were all ga-ga over V. O. Key, who said, “Politics is people. It is personal. It is individual.” V. O. Key had written the highly regarded tome, Southern Politics, an empirical study that refuted several key misconceptions about how political power was controlled and maintained in the not completely solid south. What everyone loved about this and subsequent volumes by other political scientists was that empirical research – actual observation and reporting of reality – had been brought to bear on a subject that had been shrouded in anecdote, guesswork, storytelling, and dust bunnies in corners of musty academic offices.
OK, that’s the background, and remember I was only half-smart which I define as having read a lot of stuff and memorized a lot of facts, but I didn’t have anything in my fluffy little head that really made sense of my facts and stuff. But I loved the back-and-forth, the wheeling-dealing, the this-for-that, the dare we say, quid pro quo, of politics. Because that’s what it was: you vote for this bill and I’ll vote for that bill. For sure this led to a lot of abuse: military bases, VA hospitals, highways, bridges, being built in maybe not the most efficacious, appropriate, or useful areas. Ask yourself: why is the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California while rockets are built in Huntsville, Alabama and the Johnson Space Center is in Houston, Texas?
But the awkward inefficiencies aside, a lot of good got done with the quid pro quo of politics: Social Security, desegregation, the Voting Rights Act, Medicare, Medicaid, the EPA, the National Environmental Protection Act, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
I loved the wheeling and dealing, the negotiating for advantage. I had read The Selling of the President as well as The Making of the President – 1968. I was enthralled by those books. To show us how the process worked and disabuse some of us of our idealistic notions, the political science department staged a mock nominating convention (not a mock election). I, being only half-smart, and apparently having no idealistic notions whatsoever, managed to align myself with the dark horse candidate who won. He (of course, it was a he, this was the sixties, man) and his supporters got A’s, everyone else something less. The favorite candidate was extremely annoyed he lost. He was also a pompous ass. His comeuppance was delicious.
This quid pro quo is how we imperfectly move forward as a society. Two steps forward, one step back, the good with the bad, the salt with the sugar, but slowly a world gets made that while imperfect, is at least worth living in.
– Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill, Jr., Speaker of the House of Representatives
Yup. It’s all local. Because you can always attack your opponent where he lives. You can always use past misdeeds or perceived misdeeds to paint your opponent in an unflattering light. I accept this because we all have to own up to our mistakes and do better. It’s not the crime folks, it’s the coverup.
Here’s what I can’t accept:
Lies. Too much money. No quid pro quo. Lies.
John McCain saw the rot in the Federal Budget and thought that elimination of pork barrel spending – the this-for-that that had oiled the wheels of progress for so long – would, at a minimum, pare down unnecessary and ill-considered spending. It may have. But his Earmark Elimination Act, introduced on January 23, 2018 removed a pin from the three-legged stool that made the House and Senate work. Without those this-for-that earmarks, there was no reason to walk across the aisle and get someone to vote with you. There were no carrots any more, only sticks. And everyone proceeded to use their sticks on each other.
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (also known as the McCain-Feingold Act which was the Senate bill that didn’t actually get enacted but rather the Shays-Meehan Act which originated in the House) was supposed to effect real campaign finance reform. Unfortunately when challenged in court it led to the infamous Supreme Court Citizens United v. FEC ruling which opened the floodgates on corporate money by holding that corporations had the right of free speech. The sheer piles and quantity and mounds and heaps of money that are allowed in running for public office are astounding. Look at Mike Bloomberg’s ad buys – its possible he may actually buy a nomination. Money was always in politics but now the wealthy took a page from Reagan’s playbook on ending the Cold War – spend your enemy into oblivion – and obliterate any pol or issue that comes at odds with their purposes. Money can swamp anything.
The lies. The out and out lying on Facebook, the revolting tweets, the opinion commentators on Fox and MSNBC and CNN that masquerade as news — a plague on all your houses. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act requires that any ad promoting a candidate for public office must have the words I’m so-and-so and I approve this ad attached to it. It may be in teeny tiny type but it’s there. At least if you’re telling baldfaced falsehoods about your opponent you have to confess to telling them. But this doesn’t stop PACs from running ads that imply a whole host of misleading half-truths.
(Now to get another more in-depth perspective you might want to look at this article on Vox from June 2017 – Two eminent political scientists: The problem with democracy is voters and if you get really interested then look at their book, Democracy for Realists.)
But back to my original statement which if you forgot (you’re still here? Man, are you bored) is why I won’t write about politics here.
Politics isn’t fun any more because no one knows how to do it. Everyone has run to their ideological corners and won’t come out. The Democrats try to pry the Republicans out of that corner and wheedle them into the light to pass some watered-down legislation. But unless it includes money for something the Republicans really, really want or tax cuts for someone the Republicans really, really owe – no dice. The most laughable example of this was the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Here were the Democrats trying to come up with a win-win for everybody and the Republicans pretending to want to work together. After they drained the Act of the public option, weighed it down with the individual mandate (an idea that originated at the Heritage Foundation and was originally proposed by Newt Gingrich) the Republicans ultimately voted against it’s passage. Not one Republican could bring themselves to cross the aisle and take a step to solving a problem which has been talked about since before FDR’s time. Talk about Lucy ripping the football away just as Charlie Brown tries to kick it. Ditto issues like immigration, climate change, reining in government spending — nothing is getting done.
Politics is inherently a creature of compromise. It embodies the principle of half a loaf is better than none. If you don’t understand that, I got nothing for you.
On his desk in the Oval Office, President Reagan kept a small plaque with the words: “There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he does not mind who gets the credit.”
Politics is about accomplishing goals to further a more perfect union. Why else do it? Power is not a satisfying end in itself, not really. It must be used, for good or ill. But, why not for good? Why not for lasting achievement? OK, apparently some idealism took root somewhere along the way.
But power as wielded by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is largely to block the other side and to insure that any accomplishments by the Republican side will be upheld in the courts even after their power is gone. There’s no bargaining, no negotiating, no give-and-take. No politics.
Well where’s the fun in that? And this is from a person who can tell you the battleground states. Who can tell you some funny stories about Lyndon Johnson and Everett Dirksen and who remembers that once upon a time Montana and Idaho sent DEMOCRATIC Senators to Washington. A person who has lived long enough to look at the presidencies of Johnson and Nixon and see not only the failures but also the accomplishments. While I won’t ever feel sympathy for Nixon, I feel sad that Johnson inherited the Vietnam War from Eisenhower and Kennedy because it overshadowed his truly amazing (and I don’t use that word lightly) achievements. And as a veteran of anti-war marches that’s saying something.
Both sides are in the business of winning at all costs. There are some respectable folk who’ve had no choice but to leave in disgust. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Tom Davis of Virginia, both Republicans, come to mind. Prominent Republicans like Steve Schmidt (McCain’s campaign manager) and Joe Scarborough, former Florida congressman, have renounced the GOP and become independents.
Currently I’m blaming the Republicans for not playing by the rules. The Democrats in the far past behaved just as badly. I’ve voted in every election since I could vote in 1972. I’ve voted Republican. I’ve voted Libertarian. I’ve voted Independent. I’ve voted Democrat. I’ve only voted for the winning presidential candidate in four elections out of twelve.
No one knows how to do politics any more. It’s a vicious free-for-all with no rules. (I haven’t even touched on gerrymandering and voter suppression which is just…wrong.) There is no desire to form a more perfect union. There is only us and them. And pretty soon, if this keeps up, both sides will lose.